This paper is published in Volume-4, Issue-2, 2018
Area
Structural Engineering
Author
Shivani, Dr. Gopinath Nayak
Org/Univ
Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Pub. Date
18 April, 2018
Paper ID
V4I2-1974
Publisher
Keywords
Composite infilled column, Composite encased column, Base shear, and Lateral displacement

Citationsacebook

IEEE
Shivani, Dr. Gopinath Nayak. Comparative study on CEC and CIC in composite buildings, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.

APA
Shivani, Dr. Gopinath Nayak (2018). Comparative study on CEC and CIC in composite buildings. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 4(2) www.IJARIIT.com.

MLA
Shivani, Dr. Gopinath Nayak. "Comparative study on CEC and CIC in composite buildings." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 4.2 (2018). www.IJARIIT.com.

Abstract

Construction of steel building is booming in many parts of the world. The composite building consists of steel deck slab, steel beam, and composite column. In case of high rise composite buildings, Composite Encased Columns (CEC) or Composite Infilled Columns (CIC) are used. To determine the optimal column from CEC and CIC based on the seismic response and quantity of the material when used in a G+14 composite building is the objective of the study. Models of the composite building with infilled and encased columns are analyzed and designed using ETABs. Seismic analysis is done by Response spectrum method based on Indian code. Wind analysis is also carried out as per Indian Codes. The software results are analyzed for seismic behavior and the quantity of the material used for CEC and CIC are compared.