This paper is published in Volume-4, Issue-2, 2018
Area
Manual Therapy
Author
Dr. Subrat Samal, Dr. Snehal Samal
Org/Univ
Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi, Maharashtra, India
Pub. Date
28 April, 2018
Paper ID
V4I2-2216
Publisher
Keywords
Maitland mobilization, Adhesive capsulitis.

Citationsacebook

IEEE
Dr. Subrat Samal, Dr. Snehal Samal. Maitland mobilization is more effective in non-diabetic than diabetic patients a comparative study, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.

APA
Dr. Subrat Samal, Dr. Snehal Samal (2018). Maitland mobilization is more effective in non-diabetic than diabetic patients a comparative study. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 4(2) www.IJARIIT.com.

MLA
Dr. Subrat Samal, Dr. Snehal Samal. "Maitland mobilization is more effective in non-diabetic than diabetic patients a comparative study." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 4.2 (2018). www.IJARIIT.com.

Abstract

To study efficacy of Maitland Mobilization in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis, Sample size: 50 patients (25 in each group),Study Design: Interventional Study, Study setting: A 1950 bedded tertiary care teaching hospital with well equipped medical and surgical intensive care unit and musculoskeletal department, Sample and Sampling method: 50 patients were randomly selected and assigned to 2 groups, as Group 1(control group), Group 2 (Interventional group) in equal numbers.Exclusion Criteria. The total subjects of 50 were included in the study the inclusion & exclusion criteria were Inclusion Criteria: Unilateral adhesive capsulitis defined as loss of active movement of the shoulder joint relative to the affected side, in abduction and external rotation; gender male and female age group, Duration of complaints of 2 weeks to 3 months; Exclusion Criteria were : Previous manipulation under anesthesia of the affected shoulder, other conditions involving the shoulder (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, damage of the glenohumeral cartilage, osteoporosis, or malignancies in the shoulder region),Neurologic deficits affecting shoulder function in normal daily activities,pain or disorders of the cervical spine, elbow, wrist, or hand, Injection with corticosteroids in the affected shoulder in the preceding 4 weeks. Subjects with diabetes mellitus were accepted, Any h/o of trauma fracture and fall, Any orthopedic or neurological limitations. Result: After 4-wk rehabilitation, the shoulder abduction active range of motion in non-diabetes and diabetes patients for involved extremity has increased compared to the pre-rehabilitation period Vas was 4.81,3.16,2.46, Abduction was 57.73,67.93,80.13 and external rotation was 39.44,43.50,80.21. Conclusion: The rehabilitation program used in this study have shown that the treatments procedure was more significant in non-diabetic as compared to diabetic patients moreover recurrence rate was more in diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetic patients