This paper is published in Volume-3, Issue-1, 2017
Area
Software Engineering
Author
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur
Org/Univ
Bahra Group of Institutes, Patiala, India
Keywords
Software, Defect, Prediction, Feature Selection.
Citations
IEEE
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur. Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.
APA
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur (2017). Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 3(1) www.IJARIIT.com.
MLA
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur. "Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 3.1 (2017). www.IJARIIT.com.
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur. Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.
APA
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur (2017). Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 3(1) www.IJARIIT.com.
MLA
Ramandeep Kaur, Harpreet Kaur. "Software Defect Prediction Using Support Vector Machine." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 3.1 (2017). www.IJARIIT.com.
Abstract
Developing a defect free software system is very difficult and most of the time there are some unknown bugs or unforeseen deficiencies even in software projects where the principles of the software development methodologies were applied carefully. Due to some defective software modules, the maintenance phase of software projects could become really painful for the users and costly for the enterprises. In previous work, original data was taken with 21 features and 21 features are having high dimension features which increase the complexity of processing. Ignored the boundary decision for software default predictor because boundary condition is not detected by the previously used classifier. Features of compaction were not considered because of that information is overlapped and the prediction error is increased. They are not able to train the component based classifier which results in more prediction error.